As I’ve been following the recent developments regarding
immigration in the United States and the varied responses from both those
inside and outside the faith of Christianity, I’m left asking a familiar
question, “Why is it so easy for the church to lose its way.” This question isn’t tied to or rooted in a
particular party ideology or political platform, instead it’s rooted in a
pastoral angst, whereby, those that give confession to following Jesus often
fail to wrestle with deeply meaningful issues in a way that bears witness to a
counter-cultural presence.
As followers of Christ, our presence in this world ought to
be one of light, life, justice, hope, and redemption. We are to bear witness to
God’s Counter-Cultural Kingdom of God. We are to think, speak, and act in ways
that forces the broader world to reckon with its public, political, and
prideful (often idolatrously violent or manipulative) postures.
We are to be different.
In following our public discourse as a church, I’ve
discovered what I believe to be four elements that threaten our capacity to
bear alternative, faithful witness. This isn’t an exhaustive list nor do I believe
I’ve “figured out a solution.” However,
I believe that awareness can illicit conviction which prompts confession,
giving space and hope to transformation.
Here are four of the ways the church loses its way…
Punditry: We live
in a culture fascinated by loud, obnoxious, divisive, seemingly larger than
life personalities. Most of these personalities
have built an extensive and sprawling spin zone, where information and news are
often filtered through a particular perspective, warped and twisted to pander
to mass appeal (a particular mass appeal depending on one’s political stances).
These pundits:
·
Privilege voices that reaffirm their stances.
·
Sensationalize every element of a story, preying
upon ignorant fears.
·
Presume the historical ignorance of their listeners
and followers, shrouding current events in novelty without investigating historical
precedent.
·
Suggest “fairness” in reportage, all the while
intentionally spinning the information, moving followers in a predetermined
direction.
·
Play the martyr, suggesting that those that
disagree with them are evil persecutors of the truth.
When followers of Jesus unthinkingly give credence,
support, and authorization to those voices, we contribute to the chaos of a “post-truth”
culture where “alternative facts” and “exploitive tactics” set the agenda for
public discourse. We must challenge
these voices by staying informed and prayerfully testing all spirits. DISCERNMENT
and WISDOM couldn’t be any more important in today’s culture.
Pragmatism: We are pragmatists. This is a philosophically
loaded word, but for the purposes of this article, I will suggest that pragmatism
asks only “what works” and “what is beneficial to me (or my niche group)” in
this particular moment. Pragmatism is absolutely disconnected from any
overarching (and especially transcendent) framework that might serve as a
filter through which to run our decisions.
We act in the moment for the purpose of the moment. For a pragmatist, might often makes right. Our
ability to act is authority enough to do so, when the action is immediately
beneficial to those with the power to act.
All decisions are ad hoc and
disconnected to a broader and more reflective framework.
As followers of Christ, pragmatism isn’t an option. We are rooted in an extended tradition that
forces us to reckon not only with “what works and what could we do in the
moment,” but instead asks, “In light of the gospel of Jesus Christ and the
announcement of the Kingdom, how should we be in this world?” Our decisions impact the evidence of our
confession. Followers of Christ play the long game of God’s redemptive reign
and make decisions consistent with that long game. Expedience based on pragmatism
often fails to recognize the injustices, prejudices, and violent tendencies
often implicit in urgency and power.
Populism: Also a loaded word in our culture, I believe populism
as I will define it in this article contributes to the corruption of the church.
Populism is often defined as concern for the interests of the ordinary person. This
alone isn’t a bad thing. We ought to be concerned
with the “ordinary,” refusing to create systems that privilege wealth, intellectual
elitism, or status. However, populism is
a concept in today’s culture often corrupted by identity politics. The “ordinary” are those with whom I belong
and my perceived placement on the margins.
We divide ourselves up into marginalized groups based on race, political/moral
categories, economic class, or ethnic difference (leading often to a nationalism
that creates a supremacy over and above others.) This populism can lead to a “mob effect” in
which voices of dissent are quickly mobbed by public ridicule, social media
shaming, and the threats of violence. Voices of dissent are enemies and thereby
threats to the well-being of the masses (defined arbitrarily).
As followers of Christ, we have forgotten that “identity
politics” just doesn’t work. Paul speaks
against this in Galatians 3:26 So in
Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, 27 for all of you who
were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. 28 There is
neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female,
for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
For those that follow Christ, we’ve entered into a new
humanity no longer bound to politics of difference, but bound by mutuality,
respect, and love that extends beyond my narrow grouping. This passion moves beyond the limits of the
baptized community into the broader humanity.
Paul also writes in 2 Corinthians
5: 16 So from now on we regard no one from a worldly point of view. Though we
once regarded Christ in this way, we do so no longer. 17 Therefore, if anyone
is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here! 18 All
this is from God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ and gave us the
ministry of reconciliation: 19 that God was reconciling the world to himself in
Christ, not counting people’s sins against them. And he has committed to us the
message of reconciliation. 20 We are therefore Christ’s ambassadors, as though
God were making his appeal through us. We implore you on Christ’s behalf: Be
reconciled to God. 21 God made him who had no sin to be sin[b] for us, so that
in him we might become the righteousness of God.
Polarization: This is the final element I want to suggest
is problematic for the church. We start with
the assumption that we are naturally at odds with one another, poised every day
for the defensive. Punditry that plays on
our fears, naturally divides us into groupings making conversation nearly
impossible. We are told there are only
and ever two sides and it is incumbent upon you to pick a side, plant a flag,
and defend your ground. Failure to do this is irresponsible and naïve. Participation in polarization creates an edge
of anger, malice, sarcasm and ultimately leaves us prepared for verbal and physical
violence. In a culture where conversations at work, in the home, or on social media
feel like playground skirmishes, we are now living in the post-traumatic edginess
that is always looking over our shoulder for the next fight.
As followers of Christ, we believe in the shalom of God. The peace of God, not as a failure to act or
an absence of conflict, but as the proactive posture of the people of God that
refuse to jump headlong into divisiveness, must be our priority. This does not mean we don’t act when necessary
or cast our lots in divisive situations. It means that we refuse to constantly
see and suppose one another as enemies.
It’s a refusal to attribute evil and enemy willy-nilly based only on
disagreement. When standing on divisive
issues, it stands vulnerable, sacrificially, with the hopes of redemption, reconciliation,
and restoration for all as the priority and hope. It doesn’t seek to win as much as it does to
bear witness to the Kingdom of God, on earth as it is in heaven.
It is important that in today’s culture that the church
once again embrace its counter cultural identity as the people of God, refusing
to wear that identity in arrogance, but as reconciling servant to the world. We
must learn to speak, act, converse, and love in ways that bears witness to
difference, that bears witness to the Kingdom of God. Lord help us on our way as the “People of the
Way.”